The Impact of AI-Assisted Lesson Planning on EFL Teachers’ Efficiency and Creativity in General English Courses: A Case Study at University of Zawia Language Centre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26629/uzfaj.2026.11Keywords:
الذكاء الاصطناعي، اللغة الانجليزية، الجامعة، الزاوية، ليبياAbstract
This study is titled ‘The Impact of AI-Assisted Lesson Planning on EFL Teachers’ Efficiency and Creativity in General English Courses: A Case Study at University of Zawia Language Centre’. It addresses the limited empirical evidence on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in lesson planning within Libyan higher education, despite the growing global reliance on AI tools in EFL instruction. The study aims to investigate how AI-assisted lesson planning influences EFL teachers’ efficiency, lesson quality, and creativity, while also exploring the challenges and ethical concerns teachers encounter in integrating AI into their professional practice. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used, combining quantitative data from a questionnaire completed by 15 teachers with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with eight participants. The findings indicate that AI tools, particularly generative systems such as ChatGPT, enhance teachers’ planning efficiency by reducing preparation time, supporting material organization, and stimulating creative activity design. However, teachers also reported concerns related to accuracy, cultural appropriateness, and insufficient institutional AI training. Based on these findings, the study recommends providing structured AI literacy training, developing clear institutional guidelines for responsible AI use, and encouraging context-sensitive adaptation of AI-generated materials.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
British Educational Research Association. (2018). BERA ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.).
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in education: Promises and implications. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kasneci, E. et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Instruction, 101.
Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). *Generative AI in EFL classrooms: Opportunities and challenges*. Journal of Language Teaching, 15(2), 45–62
Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Papamitsiou, Z., & Mavrikis, M. (2022). Towards AI-literate teachers: Recommendations and frameworks. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Martínez, A., & Pérez, J. (2023). *AI and teacher creativity: Evidence from classroom pilots*. Educational Technology Research, 31(4), 120–135
Mosbah, Z. M. (2024). *Analysis of ChatGPT use among Libyan EFL students*. Zawia University Journal of Education, 12(1), 33–50
OECD. (2023). AI in Education: A Guide for Policy Makers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [ https://www.oecd.org /education / ai-in-education ] (https://www.oecd.org/education/ai-in-education
UNESCO. (2023). *Guidance for Generative AI in Education*. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [ https://www.unesco.org /en/articles/guidance - generative-ai-education] (https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education
U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning.
Tan, L. (2024). *Artificial Intelligence and teacher professional development: A systematic review (2015–2024) *. Computers & Education, 190, 104616
Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Applications, opportunities, and challenges in schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 University of Zawia -Faculty of Arts Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
