Electronic Arbitration as a means of Resolving disputes in Electronic Commercem

Abstract

This research aims to shed light on the text of Article (300) of the Libyan Civil Procedure Code, to determine the extent of the possibility of direct appeal against preliminary rulings that are issued during the course of the case and do not end the judicial dispute, which we believe is one of the most important procedural means for correcting errors that may occur. The court of first instance, but unfortunately we found that this guarantee was not adopted by the Libyan Code of Procedure and was supported by the rulings of the judiciary, in application of the principle of concentration of adversaries and economy of procedures, while Jordanian legislation took a peaceful approach and stated the possibility of adopting it in some specific cases as an example; Because it may affect the origin of the right or postpone and delay access to speedy justice, Therefore, at the conclusion of this research, we concluded with a number of recommendations, the most important of which is: The Libyan legislator must develop himself on this issue and keep pace with Jordanian legislation in siding with the idea of justice by including some exceptions to the text of Article (300) Pleadings, so that it is permissible to challenge it directly before issuance. Final ruling: We also recommended the need for legal jurisprudence and students of science to contribute more effectively to studying such topics so that the picture is brought closer to the legislator and then to the judiciary in the service of justice.